• ZooVille Additional Cost's CLICK HERE
    Please Donate, Funding is critical to continue site operations.
  • WARNING: This Sub-category contains controversial subjects, viewpoints, and opinions. Due to the nature of these discussions, reports coming from these sections will be held in respect to freedom of speech and for the free debate of zoo issues. If you choose to engage in this sub-forum, you hereby agree to limited harassment reporting in regards to the topics discussed.
  • Zooville will be down temporarily for maintenence @ 9am Janurary 22nd, 2020.

Question for women

caikgoch

Citizen of Zooville
@ egoldstein, I feel your pain. One of my great wastes of life is trying to explain to all the nexpert script kiddies why you can't write code in slang. Believe it or not, they try.
 

ascendtoaccept

Citizen of Zooville
Coding is different.

It isn't that hard to say "female dog". If you thought my doggalina suggestion was serious then you are clearly a boomer
 

juan_doe_drei

Zooville Settler
Coding is different.

It isn't that hard to say "female dog". If you thought my doggalina suggestion was serious then you are clearly a boomer
one person dismisses another as a bruh, another dismisses someone as a boomer ... soon enough, nobody's listening to anybody. why do we even have this internet thing?
 

egoldstein

Zooville Settler
Coding is different.

It isn't that hard to say "female dog".
It's a whole lot easier to say bitch. It applies to coding as well, you can write clear, concise code that's efficient, or you can go out of your way to redefine things and cobble together a similar result. One is understandable and maintainable, the other is much less so and often implemented by those without a strong grasp. It's OK to not know, we all learn, but it'd be pretty silly to see someone suggest their slow, pondering function should be used instead of a standard system call. Sure it works, but why would anyone adopt *that*?

If you thought my doggalina suggestion was serious then you are clearly a boomer
LOL, oh man, I've been slain by your rapier like wit. Shit, do you know what a rapier is? Whew, urban dictionary does have the right definition, it's not (3) "When something has become more rapey, it has become more rapier than it was." just so you know. :)
 

ascendtoaccept

Citizen of Zooville
It's a whole lot easier to say bitch. It applies to coding as well, you can write clear, concise code that's efficient, or you can go out of your way to redefine things and cobble together a similar result. One is understandable and maintainable, the other is much less so and often implemented by those without a strong grasp. It's OK to not know, we all learn, but it'd be pretty silly to see someone suggest their slow, pondering function should be used instead of a standard system call. Sure it works, but why would anyone adopt *that*?


LOL, oh man, I've been slain by your rapier like wit. Shit, do you know what a rapier is? Whew, urban dictionary does have the right definition, it's not (3) "When something has become more rapey, it has become more rapier than it was." just so you know. :)
It's a type of sword, and you are being a real bitch about me not wanting to call a dog a bitch
 

egoldstein

Zooville Settler
It's a type of sword, and you are being a real bitch about me not wanting to call a dog a bitch
Nope, I've said several times you can call them what you like, I don't really care. My point has been that *you* are being a bitch and insisting that other people should't use the word bitch as it is defined and commonly used because *you* don't like it. Call them female dogs, doggalinas, fortune-cookie holders, god-damn laser light shows, it doesn't matter to me, but don't tell *me* what words *I* should use.
 

ascendtoaccept

Citizen of Zooville
but don't tell *me* what words *I* should use.
Ok John Locke...

I can tell you or anybody else what I think they should do/say. And they are free to whatever they want after that, as long as they deal the consequences.

You decided to deal with my suggestion by huffing and puffing and making yourself look like a whiny little bitch. So deal with the consequences of that
 

egoldstein

Zooville Settler
Ok John Locke...

I can tell you or anybody else what I think they should do/say. And they are free to whatever they want after that, as long as they deal the consequences.

You decided to deal with my suggestion by huffing and puffing and making yourself look like a whiny little bitch. So deal with the consequences of that
LOL, says the guy who started the diversion and who's only defense is "bruh, I only read urban dictionary" then has to retreat to insults because he's out of actual points. Thanks for the giggles, but if you don't have any actual points then this is dead to me...

Anyhow, I find it surprising what appears to be the general concensus here. I've been aware for a long time that men and women are often stimulated differently, but it's more one-sided than I would have expected. It will be interesting to see how more self-reports from the ladies stack up over time.
 

ascendtoaccept

Citizen of Zooville
LMAO you can't even get your facts straight. Kristy started this diversion. But actually you did when you decided to get pissy and me and here's stance on this issue

I don't need any points. That implies I want to argue and change your mind. All I am doing is defending my position
 
Top